29 June 2020

The Tipping Point for ESG is Now (Part Two)

VICTORIA GEDDES, Executive Director.

In Part 1 of our article on ESG last month* we looked at the extent to which ESG reporting has gained hold in Australia and whether the strong performance of ESG funds recently might represent a moment in time when investing according to ESG principles becomes mainstream.

We introduced the Standard Setters in the industry – four organisations globally that have established ESG reporting frameworks for organisations.

Each of these organisations’ approaches the question of what to report on and how best to promote a collective commitment to corporate sustainability differently. In this newsletter we take a closer look at the origins of each reporting framework, how they differ and who, amongst Australian corporates, have adopted them. We also highlight a development in Europe that could signal the inevitability of companies including non-financial disclosure for sustainability in their annual reporting calendar.

The United Nations Global Compact

This is the world’s largest corporate sustainability initiative. It provides a universal language for corporate responsibility and builds a framework around Principles and Goals.

In Australia, the business-led Global Compact Network Australia brings together signatories to the UN Global Compact, including a number of Australia’s leading companies, non-profits and universities, to advance corporate sustainability and sustainable development.

Listed companies that are signatories include Brambles, Worley Parsons, Pact Group, Orora, Suncorp and Westpac.

The Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)

This was an initiative of the G20 Financial Stability Board (FSB), a body which was set up in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to try to avoid similar market shocks. A task force developed a set of voluntary, consistent disclosure recommendations for use by companies in reporting on their climate-related financial risks. The final version of this framework was released in June 2017 attracting the support of over 240 organisations, including 150 financial institutions that manage a combined AU$100 trillion.

The TCFD framework recommends companies incorporate climate risk disclosures into mainstream annual financial reporting. Their guidelines emphasize overall governance, strategy, risk management, metrics and targets. They provide suggestions for implementing disclosures in a practical manner, including the use of “scenario analysis”. For example, how a business would respond to and address the risks brought on by a 1.5 to 3-degree change in average temperatures.

Activist group, Market Forces, actively monitors the quality of company disclosure in relation to TCFD guidelines. There are at least 25 Australian listed companies that reference TCFD as guiding their disclosures including AGL, Stockland, South32, Macquarie Bank, Commonwealth Bank, BHP, Westpac, ANZ and Dexus.

The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

This is an international, independent standards organization that helps businesses, governments and other organizations understand and communicate their impacts on issues like climate change, human rights and corruption. Headquartered in Amsterdam, it was founded in 1997 with the help of the United Nations Environment Programme, Ceres, and the Tellus Institute.

There is a wealth of information and resources available on the GRI website (www.globalreporting.org) including a library of company sustainability reports that have been developed using GRI standards and a reporting starter kit for those beginning the process.

There are close to 40 Australian companies that have registered their Sustainability Report with GRI over the past three years (www.globalreporting.org/reportregistration/verifiedreports) including Viva Energy, iress Group, Sydney Airport, Sandfire Resources, Oceana Gold, Independence Group, Amcor, Telstra, Wesfarmers and ANZ.

The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)

SASB is a nonprofit organization headquartered in San Francisco and founded in 2011 to develop and disseminate sustainability accounting standards. An Investor Advisory Group (IAG) was formed in 2016 which today comprises 51 asset owners and asset managers–spanning 11 countries across Asia, Europe, and North America–with roughly US $40 trillion in assets under management. Australia’s Future Fund joined the IAG in April this year.

In 2018, after six years of intensive research, the SASB approved the world’s first industry-specific sustainability accounting standards. They are designed to improve the effectiveness and comparability of corporate disclosure on ESG factors by meeting the need for industry-specific reporting standards. In doing so the Sustainable Industry Classification System® (SICS®) was developed covering eleven sectors and 77 industries with companies grouped into industries based on shared sustainability risks and opportunities. An interactive Materiality Map is provided which helps businesses identify and compare what disclosure topics are financially material to their sector and industry.

The SASB framework is divided into five categories, which are referred to as “dimensions”: environment, social capital, human capital, business model and innovation, and leadership and governance. These dimensions cover issues ranging from health-and-safety, to the industry’s environmental footprint, and bribery and corruption.

Given that the SASB framework was released two years ago it is still early days in terms of adoption. There has however already been strong adoption by companies in the US (257) with Westpac the first to report according to SASB guidelines in Australia.

A Global Non-Financial Reporting Template is Coming

While it is true that ESG reporting is not mandatory, the fact that fund managers and asset owners who control companies’ access to capital, including the powerful global index funds, are taking it seriously makes it increasingly hard for companies to ignore.

In the US and most other countries in the western world, companies are required to disclose any information that could have a material impact on the company’s bottom line with +/- 5% being a standard rule of thumb. The SASB standards potentially have the power to be as binding, particularly in the US given that they are bound by the same disclosure laws governing US securities. As a result failure to report on the sustainability standards could have serious consequences.

Europe is already well down the track on ESG. In 2014 a directive was issued that corporations with more than 400 employees must also report on non-financial disclosure for sustainability in their reports (NFRD). Within three years, more than 7,000 European companies were reporting on environmental, social and employee-related, human rights, anti-corruption and bribery matters. The approach taken by the NFRD is rigorous in that it requires companies to disclose not just how sustainability issues may impact the company, but also how the company affects society and the environment – the double-materiality approach.

The European Commission is currently in the process of reviewing submissions regarding changes to the NFRD which it is thought could lead to a globally accepted system of standards for non-financial disclosure. As we saw with MiFID 2, regulatory changes impacting financial markets and reporting in Europe, quickly become adopted globally.

* firstadvisers.com.au/the-tipping-point-for-esg-is-now/

28 May 2020

The Tipping Point for ESG is Now

VICTORIA GEDDES, Executive Director. The relentless push towards the adoption of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) reporting by companies across the globe appears to be gaining momentum. As entire populations have gone into hibernation in an effort to contain the spread of the coronavirus, the topic of greatest interest in the global investment community is […]

Read More
29 June 2019

Is 2019 ‘The Year of the ESG Fund’?

BEN REBBECK, Executive Director The ascendency of ESG matters within Fund managers, Board rooms and with IROs has unquestionably been rising rapidly in recent years. In this context, a question we often address from Directors and IRO is: Are ESG funds just another short term market trend, like ‘Hedge Funds’ were some 5 to 10 years […]

Read More
29 March 2019

Feb 2019 Guidance Review

DAN JONES, MANAGER SHAREHOLDER ANALYTICS During February we monitored companies in the S&P/ASX300 Index that reported for the period ending 31 December 2018, building a picture of the approach to guidance in this market and what that guidance is telling us about outlook for FY19. Around three quarters of companies within the S&P/ASX 300 index […]

Read More
31 January 2019

February reporting preview

We entered the last reporting season in August 2018 with a high degree of optimism. That optimism was very short-lived as markets experienced a sharp sell-off in August, with actual results falling short of previous forecasts. Subsequently, news headlines have kept investors in a pessimistic mood, examples being the ongoing Brexit uncertainty and the ever-present […]

Read More
31 January 2019

Timing Matters When Releasing Results

It is important for a company to select an appropriate day when presenting its financial results.  With so many companies competing for attention from buy-side, sell-side and financial media, the correct timing of a result can be very important, especially for smaller companies. Understanding where the peaks and troughs are during a reporting season can help […]

Read More
1 November 2018

Annual Report – Same-Day Reporting

In July 2018, FIRST Advisers’ analysis of financial results reporting noted the continued trend by ASX 300 companies to publish their Annual Reports on the same day as their Financial Results. Termed ‘Same-Day’ or ‘Simultaneous’ reporting, we have updated our findings to see how ASX 300 companies with a June 30 balance date faired in […]

Read More
3 September 2018

Who, What & How Much? What FY19 Guidance is Telling Us

Dan Jones, Manager Shareholder Analytics During August we monitored all companies in the S&P/ASX300 Index that reported for the period ending 30 June 2018, building a picture of the approach to guidance in this market and what that guidance is telling us about outlook. Almost 250 companies within the S&P/ASX 300 index gave their results […]

Read More
27 July 2018


Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors were once the poor cousins of institutional investors’ metrics – nice to have, but not a primary driver of valuation or investment. This is no longer the case. Times have changed, investors are more sophisticated, information is more prevalent and reliable – ESG is now […]

Read More
29 June 2018

Setting the standard – ‘Same-day reporting’ of the annual report at Full Year Results

Daniel Jones, Shareholder Analytics and IR FIRST Advisers highlighted a trend amongst ASX 300 companies towards publishing annual reports on the day they announce full year results, ‘Same-Day Reporting’, in early 2017.  We have updated this analysis in order to confirm if a new standard is emerging around best practice for publishing annual reports. For […]

Read More
8 September 2017

Guidance by Australian Companies

VICTORIA GEDDES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR During the profit reporting season for the period ending 30 June 2017, we monitored all the companies in the S&P/ASX 300 that reported up to 31 August, building a picture of what the favoured approach to guidance is in this market and what that guidance is telling us about the outlook […]

Read More
2 August 2017

Trading Updates for FY17 Reported in July

As a precursor to monitoring how companies provide guidance for FY18, we have been tracking Trading Updates for FY17 that were released during July by ASX300 companies (only 4%). The take-outs are as follows: 42% provided an upgrade from their previous guidance with the price performance experiencing a similar upward trend 33% of the companies […]

Read More
1 August 2017

The Annual Report and the importance of storytelling

Philippa Ellis, Governance & Investor Relations “Stories are the most powerful communication tool we have bar none” according to Andy Goodman of The Goodman Centre. We all carry stories in our heads (pre-conceptions) that strongly influence the way we view the world. These stories cause our mind to be closed to alternative viewpoints even when […]

Read More
3 July 2017

How to Engage with Passive Investors this Reporting Season

David Whittaker, Senior Investor Relations Adviser The growth in passive investing is one of the biggest shifts occurring in global capital markets. Passive funds now hold as much as 40% of total US equity market assets, up from around 20% a decade ago*. However, very few companies are adjusting their IR strategy to take account […]

Read More
9 June 2017

The Importance of Non-Financial Information

NIRI Annual Conference 2017 Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director On 4 June 2017, the National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) Annual Conference got underway in Orlando, Florida. This Conference brings together over one thousand of the world’s thought leaders and senior professionals in Investor Relations and it is one that we have been attending religiously for the past […]

Read More
9 May 2017

When to Publish the Annual Report – A New Benchmark is Emerging

VICTORIA GEDDES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Ten years ago I can remember marvelling at those companies that managed to get it together and release their full, glossy annual report on the same day as reporting their full year results. You could count them on the fingers of one hand. More commonly, three to four months after the […]

Read More