4 September 2023

Can ESG survive the political pushback?


BEN REBBECK, Executive Director


Over the last 18 months institutional investors have been struggling to grasp two conflicting forces which, if not managed well, could cause significant ramifications for how listed companies engage with and access capital. Investors desires to embed ESG standards and principles in their disclosure are in opposition to ‘anti-woke’ regulations which seek to dictate what factors institutional investors can consider when managing investments.

Screening and stewardship of investments on environmental and social matters is hardly a new concept. In many respects, investing with an eye on ESG matters has always been part of fundamental risk and return management, with professional investors looking beyond a company’s Profit and Loss Statement to identify risks and competitive advantages that will deliver investment performance.

In recent times, a confluence of global mega-trends including the rise of passive investors; challenges like climate change; an understanding of the financial and performance benefits of gender and LGTIQA diversity; and greater access to corporate information by employees and consumers to corporate behaviour, has seen an estimated one third of total global assets under management are sustainable investments.

While investment professionals view this as entirely rational and well-founded capitalist behaviour, there are also market commentators, particularly in the USA, who views its impact on capital allocation as a direct afront to long held religious or conservative beliefs.

Many politicians are alive to this sentiment and are now responding accordingly, by labelling ESG “woke”. The implication is that the global asset management industry has been hijacked by the left of politics or unreligious.

For example, Andy Barr, the chair of the US Congress’ House Financial Services Subcommittee responsible for financial institutions, claimed America’s financial system had been “co-opted by the intolerant left that is intolerant of diversity”. For the US to be economically competitive, he said “we need our financial system to provide equal access to capital to all kinds of businesses”.

In Australia, the Opposition’s shadow assistant treasurer, Stuart Robert, said that ‘superannuation funds have no business pursuing social and environmental causes’, aligning with the Institute of Public Affairs campaign to resist “woke capital”.

Framing the argument in terms of conservative or religious values, US politicians have effectively created a new battle ground, independent of the space investment managers occupy. That is, while the notion of equal access to capital flies in the face of fundamental investment principles – risk and return management reflects capitalism – it remains completely separate to the political principles eschewed. This ensures arguments of rationality by investment managers often miss the mark in the minds of those who they are seeking to persuade.

Exploiting this sentiment, 18 US state governments have either proposed or adopted legislation over the past two years restricting state business with financial institutions that use ESG criteria to direct their investments. And in a letter to Blackrock’s Larry Fink, 19 Republican state attorneys-general told the asset manager, “Our states will not idly stand for our pensioners’ retirements to be sacrificed for BlackRock’s climate agenda.”

With a US Presidential Election on the horizon, it’s not just equity asset managers who are in the sights of self-declared ‘anti-woke’ state politicians. Ron DeSantis, Florida’s Republican governor and presidential contender, is proposing to require that public bodies that issue bonds would no longer be able to work with ratings agencies that value the bonds using ESG criteria, i.e. all large-rating agencies.

Reacting to the rising levels of emotion around ESG matters and to avoid becoming a target of unwelcome regulation, many large passive fund managers are now seeking to avoid using the term ‘ESG’, instead preferring to position assessment of all ethical matters as part of ‘contexting’ their analysis of long-term economic value. While this positioning does not represent a change to fundamental analysis, it is intended to avoid the argument to maintain the large passive fund managers’ fiduciary responsibility of maximising returns to their clients.

However, the risk of this approach is that it merely passes the political hot potato to listed companies, who are required to meet the ESG disclosure standards and demands of institutional investors. And for listed companies, avoiding an argument is not so simple. 70 to 90% of respondents in the 2023 Edelman Trust Barometer said they “expect CEOs to take a public stand on issues” such as climate change, discrimination, and the wealth gap.

As culture wars heat up, CEOs can find themselves easy targets — from all sides of politics. While avoiding discussion is not an option, a safe harbour for listed companies is to ensure ESG disclosures are anchored in transparent analysis of how they impact corporate performance and value, avoiding spin and greenwashing.

Echoing this approach, Australian Federal Minister for Financial Services Stephen Jones said in a speech at the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors conference in May this year, that sustainable business must start in the boardrooms and in investment decisions, not marketing departments.

At FIRST Advisers we assist our clients achieve this via ESG materiality assessments. ESG Materiality Assessments empower companies to easily report on the current state and outline future ESG initiatives while taking into consideration business goals and risks.  In turn this materiality assessment will directly link to the recently launched and soon to be mandatory IFRS sustainability reporting standards.

“Those who want to equate sustainable finance and ESG responsibilities with some form of woke capitalism need to have a good hard look at themselves,” Mr Jones said “because what we are talking about is the future value of companies.


1 August 2022

Building your ESG Credibility


ROWAN CLARKE, Investor Relations A company’s Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance continues to grow in importance for investors. The challenge for companies is to develop ESG reporting metrics that reflect the specific ESG issues impacting their business, while also allowing for their performance to be measured against peers. An additional layer of complexity within […]

Read More
29 June 2022

Evaluating Your IR Program


ROWAN CLARKE, Investor Relations As we enter a new financial year, it is worth reflecting on the effectiveness of your Company’s IR program. This was a topic at the 2022 National Investor Relations Institute’s (NIRI) Conference held in Boston. FIRST Advisers attended the conference in June and we summarise some of the key recommendations. Recommendation […]

Read More
29 June 2022

Perspectives on ESG from the USA


VICTORIA GEDDES, Executive Director This year the headline topics at the NIRI (National Investor Relations Institute) Conference were ESG and the importance of Purpose. The US has, like Australia, been generally late to the ESG party compared to Europe so understanding the issues at the forefront of driving change has relevance for Australia. Ron O’Hanly Chairman and […]

Read More
27 July 2021

Starting the ESG journey


ROWAN CLARKE, Investor Relations At FIRST Advisers, we are increasingly offering advice to companies on how to best position themselves to meet investor demand for ESG accountability. What was once seen as a topic for socially conscious asset managers, is now widely adopted by investors. ESG was a hot topic at the US based National […]

Read More
27 July 2018

LOOK TO YOUR GUIDANCE


Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director As we enter the 2018 results reporting season, earnings and operational guidance again becomes a topic of significant concern. Recently in the US, industry leaders including Warren Buffett and Jamie Dimon joined the debate arguing that public companies should reduce or eliminate the practice of estimating quarterly earnings (EPS), as this […]

Read More
27 July 2018

ESG IS MAINSTREAM ON MAIN STREET


Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors were once the poor cousins of institutional investors’ metrics – nice to have, but not a primary driver of valuation or investment. This is no longer the case. Times have changed, investors are more sophisticated, information is more prevalent and reliable – ESG is now […]

Read More
29 June 2018

A view from the other side of the fence


Daniel Jones, Shareholder Analytics and IR Activism was once again a hotly discussed topic at the 2018 National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) conference in Las Vegas, and with the number of large-cap activist campaigns in 2017 reaching an all-time high, it’s easy to see why. Based on my observations and discussion with professionals, an often […]

Read More
9 June 2017

What content should I have on my IR Website?


NIRI Annual Conference 2017 Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director At FIRST Advisers we are often asked to assess the content of our clients’ Investor Relations websites for the appropriateness of its content and structure and assist them implement or rebuild their IR websites. The overriding imperative is to ensure the IR website meets the information needs of […]

Read More
9 June 2017

The Importance of Non-Financial Information


NIRI Annual Conference 2017 Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director On 4 June 2017, the National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) Annual Conference got underway in Orlando, Florida. This Conference brings together over one thousand of the world’s thought leaders and senior professionals in Investor Relations and it is one that we have been attending religiously for the past […]

Read More
5 August 2016

Results should craft a convincing story


DAVID WHITTAKER, SENIOR INVESTOR RELATIONS ADVISER A recent survey presented at the National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) conference in San Diego in June highlighted how giving investors useful qualitative information when presenting your company’s financial results can make all the difference to how well the numbers are received. The institutional investors surveyed by Edelman emphasised […]

Read More
27 May 2016

Follow FIRST Advisers at the World’s Premier Investor Relations Conference


FIRST Advisers will be in San Diego next month at the premier global conference for investor relations professionals, staged by the US National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI). We will be posting live updates from our Twitter account and filing a post conference wrap up on this blog. The NIRI conference often provides a leading indicator for […]

Read More

Archives