31 January 2021

ASX introduces new ‘15% Rule’

Ben Rebbeck, Founding Director

Recently, the ASX announced updates to Guidance Note 8 on continuous disclosure requirements in relation to earnings guidance.

While the ASX retained the framework of its existing guidance in the update, its changes to Guidance Note 8 include a new ‘15% Rule’ regarding the impact of broker consensus earnings on guidance and earnings surprises, as follows:

“Where an entity does not have published earnings guidance on foot for the current reporting period and it is covered by sell-side analysts, ASX would recommend that the entity carefully consider notifying the market of a potential earnings surprise if and when it expects there to be a 15% or greater difference between its actual or projected earnings for the period and its best estimate of the market’s expectations for its earnings…”

The ASX has also set out exactly what it expects to see in an announcement about a market-sensitive earnings surprise. Notably, in some circumstances, this will require announcing quantitative guidance even if it had never published earnings guidance in the first place.

Following the changes, generally, earning guidance disclosure requirements, in declining order of importance to any disclosure, can be summarised as follows:

Guidance published No Guidance Published
Analyst Coverage
No Guidance Published
No Analyst Coverage
Expected earnings 5%–10% above or below guidance range (i.e.no change in rule) Expected earnings and consensus differ by 15% ASX has not provided precise percentage guidance.
15–20% change to pcp may be relevant benchmark
Update guidance range Provide guidance and state earnings expected to differ materially from consensus Provide guidance re expected difference to the previous corresponding period

In making these changes, the ASX has affirmed that these benchmarks are indicative of when an earnings surprise announcement ‘should be considered’, rather than ‘should be made’.  While subtle, this wording difference is critically important.  They stress it is only an expected material impact on share price and market trading which drives the requirement for an ASX announcement. That is, no expected material impact on share price / trading…no announcement required.

So if the market has already taken into account sector and market specific events impacting share price, the effect of those events causing the earnings surprise need not be announced.   We suspect it will take a highly confident board to make such a non-disclosure decision.

The changes introduced by the ASX are particularly notable in the current environment as:

  • The quantum and quality of broker analyst research continues in its long term decline trend, spurred on more recently by the impacts of MIFID II, COVID-19 related employee changes and ongoing margin contraction within brokers; and
  • many ASX listed entities withdrew their earnings guidance shortly after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and have not since reinstated issuing earnings guidance. The 15% Rule effectively overrides this position.

It could be argued that the changes impose a new regulatory burden as they expressly require listed entities to monitor and treat broker consensus as the benchmark of market expectation and, furthermore, they require such entities to correct “mistakes” and “errors” by analysts.

And while, for mid- and small-caps dealing with issues associated with declining analyst coverage is nothing new, large caps are finally having to address this reality. In that respect, it has always been the case that entities should avoid “earnings surprises” even where they do not issue earnings guidance.

The introduction of the ‘15% Rule’ will give greater clarity to what may be considered to be an earnings surprise.

Notwithstanding this, by including the notion of entities making a ‘best estimate of market expectation’; the ASX acknowledges that the universe of published analyst research may include:

  • out of date forecasts,
  • erroneous assumptions and analysis; and
  • the impact of outlier forecasts on consensus.

Consideration should therefore be given to which analysts’ research is included in the ‘best estimate’ of consensus and which is not.   It has long been FIRST Advisers’ view that any listed company that refers to ‘consensus’ should expressly state what that consensus range is or includes.   Thus, the new ASX guidance reaffirms FIRST Advisers’ long held position.

Finally, the ASX has also taken the opportunity to make some minor editorial changes to Guidance Note 8, noting the recent decision in ASIC v Big Star Energy Limited. In that case, the Court held that Big Star breached Listing Rule 3.1 by announcing the sale of a significant asset without disclosing: (a) the identity of the purchaser; (b) that the entity had done no due diligence to verify the capacity of the purchaser to complete the purchase; and (c) that the entity had in fact been informed by the purchaser that it had not yet received all funding approvals required to complete the purchase. The transaction ultimately failed to complete. The Court specifically rejected an argument by the entity that because the purchase was for a cash consideration, the identity of the purchaser was not material.

31 August 2020

Activism in 2020

VICTORIA GEDDES, Executive Director. At FIRST Advisers we pay close attention to the activist space in Australia, having worked on many campaigns for both activists and companies over the past ten years. In our monthly newsletter we have a regular slot that summarises for our readers the various activist campaigns over that month and we […]

Read More
30 July 2020

Assessment of Virtual AGMs — Must try harder!

BEN REBBECK, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR As the repercussions of the COVID pandemic started to impact the corporate sector ASIC, the Australian corporate regulator, following advice and prompting from their foreign counterparts, allowed Australian listed companies to hold fully virtual Annual General Meetings. ASIC’s pathway to enable virtual AGMs, as they were the first to admit, was […]

Read More
28 July 2020

Corporate Purpose during the Coronavirus pandemic

GILES RAFFERTY, Corporate Communications and Media Advisor, writing for the Winter 2020 Issue of Listed@ASX. What does the Coronavirus pandemic and the ‘new normal’, that is expected to emerge in its wake, mean for a Company’s purpose? As the pandemic surges across the globe many senior corporate leaders will, rightly, view the immediate purpose of […]

Read More
30 October 2019

Australian Activism: Down but far from out

VICTORIA GEDDES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR As we approach the end of the year with, realistically, less than two months left to launch and complete a new campaign, the stats already tell us most of what we need to know about the changing shape of activism in Australia in 2019. Activity is 20% down on last year’s […]

Read More
29 June 2019

Leading with Purpose

GILES RAFFERTY, Corporate Communications and Media Advisor We are fast approaching the first reporting season under the 4thedition of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations. An aspect of the new Principles and Recommendations, which we wrote about in our March 28th ‘Purpose for the Board’ blog, is the elevation of responsibility for linking a company’s […]

Read More
4 June 2019

Time for Proxy Advisors

GILES RAFFERTY, Corporate Communications and Media Advisor AGM season may seem a long way off for many ASX listed companies but June and July are prime time for engaging with proxy advisors in advance of the peak months of proxy season, between August and October. Proxy advisors play a vital role in helping inform investment […]

Read More
28 March 2019

Purpose for the Board

GILES RAFFERTY, Corporate Communications and Media Advisor A listed company’s Purpose is now, very much, a matter for Board consideration. The latest edition of the ASX’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations makes it clear the Board is responsible for linking a company’s Purpose to its strategic goals. Principle 3 states a listed entity should instil a […]

Read More
4 March 2019

Cybersecurity: reported data breaches surge almost 700% in 2018

As we mark the one-year anniversary of the introduction of the Federal Government’s Notifiable Data Breach (NDB) scheme, the headlines focused on cybersecurity breaches seem to be coming thick and fast. The attack in early February 2019 on the Australian Federal Parliament’s computer network, has been identified by Prime Minister Scott Morrison as the work […]

Read More
4 March 2019

ASX Governance Recommendations

ASX Corporate Governance Council (the Council) launched its 4th Edition of the Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations on 27 February after more than a year of consultation. It includes input from the nineteen diverse member groups of the ASX Corporate Governance Council, including associations representing the interests of shareholder groups (ASA) and listed companies who are communicating […]

Read More
31 January 2019

The importance of being purposeful

A well understood and expressed corporate purpose drives long term value. This is why purpose, as a driver of profitability, was a central theme of the 2019 letter from Larry Fink, CEO of Blackrock, the world’s largest investment manager, to the Board’s and senior managers of companies Blackrock has holdings in. It has also been the […]

Read More
29 November 2018

Interesting times: 2018 in review

Giles Rafferty, Media and Corporate Communications “May you live in interesting times”, is often presented as a Chinese curse and, as we enter the final month of 2018, it has certainly been an interesting year thus far. In Australia, the Banking Royal Commission has been the dominant story in the financial media during the latter […]

Read More
2 October 2018

Make AGMs great again!

Giles Rafferty, Corporate Communications Annual General Meetings (AGMs) have to happen, it’s the law.  Consequently, the AGM is a regular fixture in a listed company’s financial calendar when the Board can be sure stakeholders are looking their way. This also makes the AGM a valuable communication moment. There are, of course, a number of necessary […]

Read More
27 July 2018


Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors were once the poor cousins of institutional investors’ metrics – nice to have, but not a primary driver of valuation or investment. This is no longer the case. Times have changed, investors are more sophisticated, information is more prevalent and reliable – ESG is now […]

Read More
29 June 2018

A view from the other side of the fence

Daniel Jones, Shareholder Analytics and IR Activism was once again a hotly discussed topic at the 2018 National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) conference in Las Vegas, and with the number of large-cap activist campaigns in 2017 reaching an all-time high, it’s easy to see why. Based on my observations and discussion with professionals, an often […]

Read More
29 June 2018

ASIC Review of Proxy Adviser Engagement Practices

Victoria Geddes, Executive Director Following FIRST Adviser’s ‘Time to talk to Proxy Advisers’ post last month, ASIC has published its review of proxy adviser engagement practices. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission acted after business organisations complained some proxy firms are unwilling to engage, correct inaccuracies or give time for companies to clarify errors. ASIC’s […]

Read More
29 May 2018

ASX to make purpose key to good governance

Giles Rafferty, Corporate Communications and Media Advisor The Financial Services Royal Commission is shining a light on governance failures at some of Australia’s largest businesses. It has also revealed a clear need to restore trust in Australian listed companies. The ASX Corporate Governance Council is seeking to address the trust deficit by updating the Principles and Recommendations […]

Read More
29 May 2018

Time to Talk to Proxy Advisers

Victoria Geddes, Executive Director It seems a strange thing to put on the IR agenda, with AGM season still 5 months away for most Australian companies, but June and July are the months when companies are best placed to gain access to proxy advisors outside the peak months of proxy season (April, May, September, October, […]

Read More
30 April 2018

Mandatory Reporting of Data Breaches in Australia is Off and Running

Victoria Geddes, Executive Director, Writing for the Autumn 2018 Issue of Listed@ASX On February 22, 2018 the Federal Government’s new Scheme for the mandatory reporting of cybersecurity breaches that result in the loss of personal data came into effect. Every private and public company with annual turnover of $3 million or more, listed or not, is […]

Read More
4 October 2017


Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director Kiwis have for some time been seen to be leading their Aussie cousins in numerous areas of social, commercial and legislative progress.  And Investor Relations, specifically in relation to retail-focused shareholder meetings, is no exception. It is easy for Australians to make excuses as to why so often New Zealand leads the […]

Read More
4 October 2017

AGM’s and the changing voting landscape

Dan Jones, Shareholder Analytics & Investor Relations With results and subsequent investor roadshows behind them, many companies have turned their attention to their upcoming AGM. Along with considerations such as shareholder presentations, Q&A preparation, requirements of shareholder analytics and/or proxy solicitation support, etc. thought should also be given to how the voting landscape is continuing to […]

Read More
1 August 2017

The Evolving Board Role in Determining Corporate Culture

Philippa Ellis, Governance & Investor Relations Not a day seems to go by without some headline homing in on yet another corporate scandal with its genesis often attributed to a lax or loose corporate culture. In Australia it has most recently focused on the wealth management and life insurances divisions of the major banks. ASIC […]

Read More
3 July 2017

How to Engage with Passive Investors this Reporting Season

David Whittaker, Senior Investor Relations Adviser The growth in passive investing is one of the biggest shifts occurring in global capital markets. Passive funds now hold as much as 40% of total US equity market assets, up from around 20% a decade ago*. However, very few companies are adjusting their IR strategy to take account […]

Read More
9 June 2017

The Importance of Non-Financial Information

NIRI Annual Conference 2017 Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director On 4 June 2017, the National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) Annual Conference got underway in Orlando, Florida. This Conference brings together over one thousand of the world’s thought leaders and senior professionals in Investor Relations and it is one that we have been attending religiously for the past […]

Read More
5 October 2016

Innovation: the new paradigm in Registries – or is it?

RACHEL SAKURAI, COMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES GM QUEENSLAND Fintech, blockchain, disruption, innovation – these are the buzzwords and hot topics that currently saturate the airwaves and are almost certainly not ones that would spring to mind when thinking about big process-driven registry companies. For listed companies the process of signing up a registry provider for the […]

Read More
5 July 2016

Surviving Brexit: Disclosure and guidance in uncertain times

Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director If there is one consistent thing the financial markets are saying about Brexit, it’s that there are uncertain times ahead for every major economy – and by extension, for the prospects and financial performance of every major company. When uncertainty reigns, we often hear management or Boards describe disclosure and guidance […]

Read More
27 May 2016

Follow FIRST Advisers at the World’s Premier Investor Relations Conference

FIRST Advisers will be in San Diego next month at the premier global conference for investor relations professionals, staged by the US National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI). We will be posting live updates from our Twitter account and filing a post conference wrap up on this blog. The NIRI conference often provides a leading indicator for […]

Read More
1 July 2015

ASX’s New Continuous Disclosure Guidelines Apply From Today

Philippa Ellis, Corporate Governance & Company Secretarial ASX Guidance Note 8 Continuous Disclosure (GN8), which expands the guidance on earnings surprises, publication of analyst forecasts and consensus estimates, and investor briefings, comes into force today (July 1). The ASX released its consultation paper outlining its proposed changes to GN8 in March 2015. On June 22 […]

Read More
18 May 2015

Guidance to go out of fashion?

The new ASX guidelines may discourage companies from making earnings predictions public The proposed changes to the guidelines for listed companies on their continuous disclosure obligations (ASX Guidance Note 8) will provide greater clarity and a more pragmatic approach for companies that find themselves facing a sudden change in their profit expectations and want to […]

Read More