30 July 2020

Assessment of Virtual AGMs — Must try harder!

BEN REBBECK, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR


As the repercussions of the COVID pandemic started to impact the corporate sector ASIC, the Australian corporate regulator, following advice and prompting from their foreign counterparts, allowed Australian listed companies to hold fully virtual Annual General Meetings.

ASIC’s pathway to enable virtual AGMs, as they were the first to admit, was far from perfect, relying on a ‘No Action’ position for rapid implementation rather than Waivers or legislative change. Nevertheless, there was a lot to look forward to when the virtual AGM was given the green light with a fairly broad leeway for implementation including a hands-off regulator providing clear and simple guidance; an abundance of readily available and low cost technological options; and vastly greater accessibility for shareholders. Indeed, it looked like the scene was set for an explosion of innovation to ultimately deliver improved shareholder participation in AGMs in Australia. Did we see this in the first round of test case virtual AGMs? No, not really. In fact, I’m reminded of the rather charitable comment my 8th grade woodwork teacher wrote on my report card “Must try harder!”

The Positives

First, it has to be acknowledged that for the overwhelming majority of December 2019 and March 2020 reporters who recently utilised virtual/hybrid AGMs, these were their first ever formal online shareholder meetings. Additionally, the broader Australian corporate sector has little to no experience with formal online shareholder engagement. So both internal and external expertise and support structures for virtual AGMs either did not exist or were very limited.

It would be fair to say that perfection in execution under these circumstances was not a bar that anyone was setting for this exercise. Keeping the show on the road in the middle of a challenging pandemic was an enormous achievement in and of itself. While recognising this achievement by companies who have had virtual meetings to date, this broad latitude should not necessarily be extended to future virtual AGMs given experience and expertise is now available and preparation times are significantly greater.

Secondly, despite ongoing conjecture in corporate and legal circles about addressing complex and arcane legal meeting requirements, such as physical quorums, ASIC provided relatively clear and principled guidance on what it was looking for from online AGMs. This is they must, as close as is possible, mirror key elements of an ‘in-person’ AGM, in summary being:

  • Ability to watch/listen
  • Ask questions
  • Vote

And with these simple and clear principals, ASIC provided an open field for companies to innovate – making best use of amazing emerging technologies and/or simple low cost solutions to best serve their particular shareholder bases. Indeed to demonstrate this, in the space of two hours, a couple of non-technically minded FIRST Advisers’ staff put together an example online AGM, that:

  • fully complied with ASIC’s requirements;
  • had double the technical capacity required for participation by holders in one of Australia’s largest share registers;
  • was more secure than ‘full-service’ Virtual AGM platforms currently in the market; and
  • was completely free, using trusted ‘off the shelf’ technologies.

The final major positive we witnessed was increased accessibility of virtual AGM’s to shareholders who may have struggled with the travel and logistics needed to attend an in-person meeting at a specific location. Alleviating this geographical constraint removes the second most significant barrier to shareholder AGM participation following ‘Not caring/Not relevant’.

The Negatives

While regulation and technology created an environment for a thriving virtual AGM calendar, for a number of reasons, the practical experience to date has been somewhat disappointing. This includes:

  • Extremely low shareholder attendance;
  • Conflicted and poor advice to companies on virtual AGM options;
  • High costs for what should be an ultra-low cost event, when compared to an in-person AGM
  • Challenges in adjusting to an online presentation environment; and
  • An absence of true innovation.

The foremost indicator of how underwhelming virtual AGM’s have been to date has been the stunningly low attendance levels by retail investors.

In my opinion, on attendance alone, the opportunity for the virtual AGM to provide all shareholders with equal access to listen to and question their board, and vote on resolutions, has been a failure. Retail shareholders are just not participating in sufficient numbers to indicate a preference for the virtual AGM experience currently being served up to them. This experience is common to both large caps and small caps and we need to better understand why.

AMP, for example, who benefits from an expansive retail shareholder base recorded attendance at its fully virtual AGM of less than 0.1% of its register. With their AGM occurring at the height of Australia’s national lock down, when their otherwise well engaged shareholders had little else to do but be at home and on the internet, (and with a well-resourced investor relations function) this low attendance figure would have been a disappointing outcome. At a lower point of the capitalisation spectrum, FIRST Advisers noted one mid-cap company had just 2 voting shareholders attend a well promoted fully virtual AGM.

Finally, we note that innovation levels have been extremely low. In recent months, this can almost entirely be attributed to the speed at which companies needed to act, limiting the opportunity to assess the breadth of virtual AGM options that are available. This has been compounded by share registries acting as 3rd party resellers of virtual AGM solutions and incentivised by the commissions they can earn. As a result most companies were offered a single platform that may not always have been the best fit for their particular needs. In some instances companies will, in the absence of good advice around alternatives, have paid fees starting at $10,000 for a virtual AGM solution built around a reskinned $95 Vimeo subscription, packaged with a chat and voting tool.

We hope that companies which will have more time to seek professional advice and genuinely innovative solutions prior to their next AGM might investigate bringing the virtual AGM process in house. Alternatively, new suppliers may enter the virtual AGM market, spurring the creation of better and cheaper offers. Indeed, one of the more technology focussed share registries is predicting virtual AGM costs will halve over the next 12 months. And for truly innovative companies, I suspect this cost reduction estimate is conservative.

In summary, companies should be commended for their efforts to deliver their AGMs in the most challenging of circumstances. And while an explanation for low participation and innovation could be the speed at which the first wave of virtual AGMs was deployed, this ignores the availability of technological alternatives and the ease and rapidity with which live video streaming technologies, such as Zoom, Google Meets and Microsoft Teams have been adopted. It also ignores the way conflicted and unhelpful recommendations from share registries, acting as 3rd party resellers of a virtual AGM solution, have limited innovation. I suspect this will change.

28 July 2020

Corporate Purpose during the Coronavirus pandemic

GILES RAFFERTY, Corporate Communications and Media Advisor, writing for the Winter 2020 Issue of Listed@ASX. What does the Coronavirus pandemic and the ‘new normal’, that is expected to emerge in its wake, mean for a Company’s purpose? As the pandemic surges across the globe many senior corporate leaders will, rightly, view the immediate purpose of […]

Read More
30 October 2019

Australian Activism: Down but far from out

VICTORIA GEDDES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR As we approach the end of the year with, realistically, less than two months left to launch and complete a new campaign, the stats already tell us most of what we need to know about the changing shape of activism in Australia in 2019. Activity is 20% down on last year’s […]

Read More
29 June 2019

Leading with Purpose

GILES RAFFERTY, Corporate Communications and Media Advisor We are fast approaching the first reporting season under the 4thedition of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations. An aspect of the new Principles and Recommendations, which we wrote about in our March 28th ‘Purpose for the Board’ blog, is the elevation of responsibility for linking a company’s […]

Read More
4 June 2019

Time for Proxy Advisors

GILES RAFFERTY, Corporate Communications and Media Advisor AGM season may seem a long way off for many ASX listed companies but June and July are prime time for engaging with proxy advisors in advance of the peak months of proxy season, between August and October. Proxy advisors play a vital role in helping inform investment […]

Read More
28 March 2019

Purpose for the Board

GILES RAFFERTY, Corporate Communications and Media Advisor A listed company’s Purpose is now, very much, a matter for Board consideration. The latest edition of the ASX’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations makes it clear the Board is responsible for linking a company’s Purpose to its strategic goals. Principle 3 states a listed entity should instil a […]

Read More
4 March 2019

Cybersecurity: reported data breaches surge almost 700% in 2018

As we mark the one-year anniversary of the introduction of the Federal Government’s Notifiable Data Breach (NDB) scheme, the headlines focused on cybersecurity breaches seem to be coming thick and fast. The attack in early February 2019 on the Australian Federal Parliament’s computer network, has been identified by Prime Minister Scott Morrison as the work […]

Read More
4 March 2019

ASX Governance Recommendations

ASX Corporate Governance Council (the Council) launched its 4th Edition of the Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations on 27 February after more than a year of consultation. It includes input from the nineteen diverse member groups of the ASX Corporate Governance Council, including associations representing the interests of shareholder groups (ASA) and listed companies who are communicating […]

Read More
31 January 2019

The importance of being purposeful

A well understood and expressed corporate purpose drives long term value. This is why purpose, as a driver of profitability, was a central theme of the 2019 letter from Larry Fink, CEO of Blackrock, the world’s largest investment manager, to the Board’s and senior managers of companies Blackrock has holdings in. It has also been the […]

Read More
29 November 2018

Interesting times: 2018 in review

Giles Rafferty, Media and Corporate Communications “May you live in interesting times”, is often presented as a Chinese curse and, as we enter the final month of 2018, it has certainly been an interesting year thus far. In Australia, the Banking Royal Commission has been the dominant story in the financial media during the latter […]

Read More
2 October 2018

Make AGMs great again!

Giles Rafferty, Corporate Communications Annual General Meetings (AGMs) have to happen, it’s the law.  Consequently, the AGM is a regular fixture in a listed company’s financial calendar when the Board can be sure stakeholders are looking their way. This also makes the AGM a valuable communication moment. There are, of course, a number of necessary […]

Read More
27 July 2018

ESG IS MAINSTREAM ON MAIN STREET

Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors were once the poor cousins of institutional investors’ metrics – nice to have, but not a primary driver of valuation or investment. This is no longer the case. Times have changed, investors are more sophisticated, information is more prevalent and reliable – ESG is now […]

Read More
29 June 2018

A view from the other side of the fence

Daniel Jones, Shareholder Analytics and IR Activism was once again a hotly discussed topic at the 2018 National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) conference in Las Vegas, and with the number of large-cap activist campaigns in 2017 reaching an all-time high, it’s easy to see why. Based on my observations and discussion with professionals, an often […]

Read More
29 June 2018

ASIC Review of Proxy Adviser Engagement Practices

Victoria Geddes, Executive Director Following FIRST Adviser’s ‘Time to talk to Proxy Advisers’ post last month, ASIC has published its review of proxy adviser engagement practices. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission acted after business organisations complained some proxy firms are unwilling to engage, correct inaccuracies or give time for companies to clarify errors. ASIC’s […]

Read More
29 May 2018

ASX to make purpose key to good governance

Giles Rafferty, Corporate Communications and Media Advisor The Financial Services Royal Commission is shining a light on governance failures at some of Australia’s largest businesses. It has also revealed a clear need to restore trust in Australian listed companies. The ASX Corporate Governance Council is seeking to address the trust deficit by updating the Principles and Recommendations […]

Read More
29 May 2018

Time to Talk to Proxy Advisers

Victoria Geddes, Executive Director It seems a strange thing to put on the IR agenda, with AGM season still 5 months away for most Australian companies, but June and July are the months when companies are best placed to gain access to proxy advisors outside the peak months of proxy season (April, May, September, October, […]

Read More
30 April 2018

Mandatory Reporting of Data Breaches in Australia is Off and Running

Victoria Geddes, Executive Director, Writing for the Autumn 2018 Issue of Listed@ASX On February 22, 2018 the Federal Government’s new Scheme for the mandatory reporting of cybersecurity breaches that result in the loss of personal data came into effect. Every private and public company with annual turnover of $3 million or more, listed or not, is […]

Read More
4 October 2017

RETAIL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS: LESSONS FROM ACROSS THE DITCH

Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director Kiwis have for some time been seen to be leading their Aussie cousins in numerous areas of social, commercial and legislative progress.  And Investor Relations, specifically in relation to retail-focused shareholder meetings, is no exception. It is easy for Australians to make excuses as to why so often New Zealand leads the […]

Read More
4 October 2017

AGM’s and the changing voting landscape

Dan Jones, Shareholder Analytics & Investor Relations With results and subsequent investor roadshows behind them, many companies have turned their attention to their upcoming AGM. Along with considerations such as shareholder presentations, Q&A preparation, requirements of shareholder analytics and/or proxy solicitation support, etc. thought should also be given to how the voting landscape is continuing to […]

Read More
1 August 2017

The Evolving Board Role in Determining Corporate Culture

Philippa Ellis, Governance & Investor Relations Not a day seems to go by without some headline homing in on yet another corporate scandal with its genesis often attributed to a lax or loose corporate culture. In Australia it has most recently focused on the wealth management and life insurances divisions of the major banks. ASIC […]

Read More
3 July 2017

How to Engage with Passive Investors this Reporting Season

David Whittaker, Senior Investor Relations Adviser The growth in passive investing is one of the biggest shifts occurring in global capital markets. Passive funds now hold as much as 40% of total US equity market assets, up from around 20% a decade ago*. However, very few companies are adjusting their IR strategy to take account […]

Read More
9 June 2017

The Importance of Non-Financial Information

NIRI Annual Conference 2017 Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director On 4 June 2017, the National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) Annual Conference got underway in Orlando, Florida. This Conference brings together over one thousand of the world’s thought leaders and senior professionals in Investor Relations and it is one that we have been attending religiously for the past […]

Read More
5 October 2016

Innovation: the new paradigm in Registries – or is it?

RACHEL SAKURAI, COMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES GM QUEENSLAND Fintech, blockchain, disruption, innovation – these are the buzzwords and hot topics that currently saturate the airwaves and are almost certainly not ones that would spring to mind when thinking about big process-driven registry companies. For listed companies the process of signing up a registry provider for the […]

Read More
5 July 2016

Surviving Brexit: Disclosure and guidance in uncertain times

Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director If there is one consistent thing the financial markets are saying about Brexit, it’s that there are uncertain times ahead for every major economy – and by extension, for the prospects and financial performance of every major company. When uncertainty reigns, we often hear management or Boards describe disclosure and guidance […]

Read More
27 May 2016

Follow FIRST Advisers at the World’s Premier Investor Relations Conference

FIRST Advisers will be in San Diego next month at the premier global conference for investor relations professionals, staged by the US National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI). We will be posting live updates from our Twitter account and filing a post conference wrap up on this blog. The NIRI conference often provides a leading indicator for […]

Read More
1 July 2015

ASX’s New Continuous Disclosure Guidelines Apply From Today

Philippa Ellis, Corporate Governance & Company Secretarial ASX Guidance Note 8 Continuous Disclosure (GN8), which expands the guidance on earnings surprises, publication of analyst forecasts and consensus estimates, and investor briefings, comes into force today (July 1). The ASX released its consultation paper outlining its proposed changes to GN8 in March 2015. On June 22 […]

Read More
18 May 2015

Guidance to go out of fashion?

The new ASX guidelines may discourage companies from making earnings predictions public The proposed changes to the guidelines for listed companies on their continuous disclosure obligations (ASX Guidance Note 8) will provide greater clarity and a more pragmatic approach for companies that find themselves facing a sudden change in their profit expectations and want to […]

Read More

Archives