30 March 2021

How fair is your SPP?

ANNA FUGLESTAD, SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Over the past year as companies have taken advantage of buoyant equities market and COVID related exemptions to undertake capital raisings, retail shareholders have jumped on the opportunity to increasing their holdings through Share Purchase Plans.

FIRST Advisers recently analyzed all Share Purchase Plans that occurred between March 2020 and February 2021. How companies in this group acted with the over-subscriptions varied significantly. Some only accepted the targeted amount to be raised, others accepted all the valid applications received, and others still were somewhere in between.

As has been apparent in the media, Boards of companies who have scaled back applications have come under significant scrutiny regarding the fairness of their allocation policies on existing shareholders. For many of the SPPs reviewed by the FIRST Advisers team it appeared questionable as to how much analysis and consideration went into determining the scale back policy and final allocation formula, if any!

Outlining Scale back policy upfront

Many SPP booklets leave the scale back policy unclear, often merely stating that the allocation policy will be done at the Boards absolute discretion.  While this is an easy policy to draft, it could give the impression the Board is giving little upfront thought to protecting shareholder value when implementing any scale back, even though this may not be true.

Where written policies are vague and given little upfront thought, once the Offer closes, Boards have only a very limited time between knowing the final value of applications received and making an informed decision regarding allocations.  And it is for these SPPs, where FIRST Advisers noted that scale backs were too often implemented crudely, such as using ‘first-come-first-serve, or ‘straight pro rata to application size’, which unfortunately resulted in maximizing shareholder dilution and often adverse media attention.

Further, stating that an Offer may close early, risks unnecessarily disenfranchising many shareholders who intend to participate but may be unable to submit their application early.  For example, with currently delayed post, many shareholders now only receive their SPP documentation mid-way through the Offer period, and therefore have little time to participate.  Others may set their payment instructions in their bank to occur on, or close to, the Offer close date, providing them with time to obtain the required funds, or limit their funds being tied up for any longer than necessary.

Policy Alternatives

There are many things for Boards to consider, with a vague policy not necessarily acting in the best interest of retail shareholders. While it is very difficult to define allocation formula until all the applications are received, it is possible to retain complete discretion for Boards while indicating a policy which seeks to achieve one or more of the following:

  • minimize/optimise the dilution or accretion impacts;
  • achieve meaningful minimum allotments;
  • reduce the number of unmarketable parcels;
  • reward shareholders who have held for a particular timeframe (particularly useful where share prices have changed materially over that timeframe); or
  • avoid double dipping by shareholders who seek to game the SPP by splitting holdings, or who have already participated in a preceding placement.

 

Consideration of Scale Back Formula Options

There is no one-size-fits-all method of implementing a scale back and the possibilities available to Boards are endless.  In an ideal world, Boards should outline a considered policy upfront, which, among other things, considers the size of the Company, likelihood of oversubscription and the composition of their shareholder base.

This then provides them with the opportunity to receive and consider a detailed analysis of actual scale back scenarios, based on the number, value and identity of applications received, in the very limited timeframe following the close of the offer and allotment.

Although not every shareholder will be perfectly happy with any scale back, at least there is a pathway to minimize the chance of implementing a poor allocation formula and demonstrate to all shareholders the Board is keeping their interests front of mind.

31 January 2021

The IPO Market in 2020 – the Final Scorecard

VICTORIA GEDDES, Founding Director In September 2020 the door to the IPO market flew open and dozens of companies poured through in a rush to list before the Christmas/New Year shut down. Memories were still fresh from late 2019 when a promising IPO market was stopped dead in tracks in October as several high profile […]

Read More
28 September 2020

Compliance update: Capital raising relief extended

This month, ASIC extended its temporary relief for capital raisings aimed to assist listed entities affected by the COVID-19 pandemic to raise capital in a quicker and less costly way without undermining investor protection. The temporary measures were due to expire in October 2020. The temporary measures will now expire on 1 January 2021. The […]

Read More
5 September 2019

ASIC ups limit for Share Purchase Plans in a win-win for investors and corporates

RON CAMERON, SENIOR ADVISER, INVESTOR RELATIONS Markets regulator, The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), has doubled the amount that retail investors can contribute to Share Purchase Plans. The change is the result of ASIC updating the Class Order that defines how ASX listed companies can issue shares, via a SPP, to registered shareholders without […]

Read More
3 September 2018

Deal Flow – Retail Investors Have a Point of View

Victoria Geddes, Executive Director Post results reporting season is a time when investment banks start engaging their clients, in advance of the year’s end, to get mergers, spin-offs and takeovers off and running. Witness the recent TPG and Vodafone merger as well as the Coles spin-off from Wesfarmers. The merits of engaging in Proxy Solicitation […]

Read More
2 November 2016

ASX Updates Admission Requirements for Listed Entities

Following an extensive consultation period, which began on 12 May 2016 with the release of the consultation paper ‘Updating ASX’s Admission Requirements for Listed Entities’ which set out a number of proposed changes to the ASX listing admission requirements, the final ASX admission requirements were released today. The key listings admission rule changes are: For […]

Read More
5 October 2016

ASIC takes a close look at social media use in capital raisings

BEN REBBECK, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Oct 5, 2016 On 19 September 2016, ASIC reported on its review of the marketing of initial public offerings to retail investors. The notable feature of this review is that ASIC is now taking a close look at the marketing capital raisings via social media and other platforms, in addition to […]

Read More
7 September 2016

Timing is Everything When Raising Capital

RON CAMERON, SENIOR ADVISER Thinking of undertaking a capital raising in the near future? If you are a larger company, you have probably had a protracted series of intense discussions on the topics of debt versus equity, placement followed by share purchase plan (SPP), entitlement offer, renounceable versus non-renounceable, pricing, underwriting, sub-underwriting, even project nicknames […]

Read More

Archives