31 May 2021

ESG at the Vanguard of proxy voting

GILES RAFFERTY, Corporate Communication and Media Advisor.


The financial markets adage is if Wall Street sneezes other markets catch cold. So it is worth keeping an eye on what’s happening in US financial markets as trends there tend to inform decision making elsewhere. In this context we have been interested to note how Vanguard, one of the Big Three index funds that loom large on the registers of companies globally, has updated their proxy voting guidelines.

The changes focus on a range of policies concerning ESG disclosures; Board diversity and Board oversight. The new guidelines came into force on 1 April 2021 and we highlight some of the key updates below.

Environmental/social disclosure

When it comes to shareholder proposals addressing environmental and social matters Vanguard has revised its guidelines to include an assessment if an issue has material risk to the sector or company and has the potential to affect long-term shareholder value. The previous guidelines required ESG proposals to have a “demonstrable link” to long-term shareholder value in order for Vanguard to support them. Vanguard is also now likely to support proposals addressing shortcomings in a company’s ESG disclosure relative to established frameworks such as the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). In addition, it will be more likely to consider ESG proposals that remain within a “governance scope,” such as those that request goal-setting against a company priority rather than how management have executed ESG initiatives.

Climate-related disclosure

Vanguard is now likely to support proposals that request disclosure on how climate change risks are incorporated into strategy and capital allocation decisions, or ask for an assessment of climate risk.

Board diversity

Vanguard is likely to vote against a company if the Board has made insufficient progress on Board diversity. It will consider its voting decisions on a case-by-case basis and will look at issues around market regulations and expectations along with company-specific issues. The fund management giant does not make specific recommendations around diversity requirements but has indicated that companies with no disclosed board gender diversity, no disclosed board racial or ethnic diversity, or a lack of a disclosed board diversity policy will be viewed as being higher risk of having a vote against them.

‘Overboarded’ directors

Vanguard does not discount supporting an ‘overboarded’ director when there are compelling company-specific facts and circumstances underpinning their appointment. It has now added a new provision linked to director diversity, under which it will consider how an ‘overboarded’ director contributes to a Board’s skills and diversity composition when deciding how to vote on the election or re-election of such a board member.

Independent chair

Vanguard takes the view the leadership of the Board is a matter for the Board so is not inclined to support separation of the roles of Chair and CEO, unless there are, what it describes as, significant independence or board effectiveness concerns. The fund manager has identified failing to manage environmental or social risks, especially where they could negatively impact shareholder value, amongst factors that may raise such independence or effectiveness concerns. Such oversight failings may prompt Vanguard to vote against responsible directors and in some cases call out the environmental and social risks as factors it considered in assessing such failures.

Conclusion

Vanguard’s policy updates suggest there will be a shift in the Fund Manager’s voting behaviour to include a greater focus on ESG and climate change-related proposals. For companies, the updated Vanguard voting guidelines are a timely reminder to take stock of how their ESG disclosures and practices compare to peer practices and market norms. The ever increasing importance of ESG reporting is exactly why FIRST Advisers has been advocating for some time that companies which have yet to include this as part of their engagement with the market, begin the journey now.

30 April 2021

Proxy Advisors in a time of COVID

GILES RAFFERTY, Corporate Communication and Media Advisor The Coronavirus pandemic continues to ravage the world, we canvassed the three main Proxy Advisory firms operating in Australia Ownership Matters, CGI Glass Lewis and ISS to get a sense of what impact corporate and government responses to the pandemic has had on governance and their voting recommendations. Widening […]

Read More
28 September 2020

TOP TEN TIPS FOR IPO COMPANIES

VICTORIA GEDDES, Executive Director. As the market braces for an avalanche of IPOs to hit the market in the December quarter, it is time to review our playbook for IPO investor relations, to highlight just what it takes to maximise the chances of a successful life after listing. Here are our top 10 Investor Relations tips […]

Read More
30 September 2019

THIS IS WHY MANY OF YOUR RETAIL SHAREHOLDERS DON’T VOTE

BEN REBBECK, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Poor retail voter turnout is often accepted as ‘the norm’ and put down to reasons such as lack of retail investor interest to lack of company engagement. While these factors may partly contribute to poor retail voting, there is one structural cause that is relatively unknown and therefore not addressed by […]

Read More
4 June 2019

Time for Proxy Advisors

GILES RAFFERTY, Corporate Communications and Media Advisor AGM season may seem a long way off for many ASX listed companies but June and July are prime time for engaging with proxy advisors in advance of the peak months of proxy season, between August and October. Proxy advisors play a vital role in helping inform investment […]

Read More
31 January 2019

The importance of being purposeful

A well understood and expressed corporate purpose drives long term value. This is why purpose, as a driver of profitability, was a central theme of the 2019 letter from Larry Fink, CEO of Blackrock, the world’s largest investment manager, to the Board’s and senior managers of companies Blackrock has holdings in. It has also been the […]

Read More
2 October 2018

Make AGMs great again!

Giles Rafferty, Corporate Communications Annual General Meetings (AGMs) have to happen, it’s the law.  Consequently, the AGM is a regular fixture in a listed company’s financial calendar when the Board can be sure stakeholders are looking their way. This also makes the AGM a valuable communication moment. There are, of course, a number of necessary […]

Read More
3 September 2018

Deal Flow – Retail Investors Have a Point of View

Victoria Geddes, Executive Director Post results reporting season is a time when investment banks start engaging their clients, in advance of the year’s end, to get mergers, spin-offs and takeovers off and running. Witness the recent TPG and Vodafone merger as well as the Coles spin-off from Wesfarmers. The merits of engaging in Proxy Solicitation […]

Read More
5 April 2018

Engaging Retail investors – work smarter not harder

It is generally accepted, at least in the Australian equity market, that Retail Investors play an important role in the construction of a balanced shareholder register. The characteristics that make them attractive are that they generally invest for the long term, are volatility averse and focus on a company’s fundamentals. However these traits can also […]

Read More
3 July 2017

How to Engage with Passive Investors this Reporting Season

David Whittaker, Senior Investor Relations Adviser The growth in passive investing is one of the biggest shifts occurring in global capital markets. Passive funds now hold as much as 40% of total US equity market assets, up from around 20% a decade ago*. However, very few companies are adjusting their IR strategy to take account […]

Read More
9 June 2017

What content should I have on my IR Website?

NIRI Annual Conference 2017 Ben Rebbeck, Executive Director At FIRST Advisers we are often asked to assess the content of our clients’ Investor Relations websites for the appropriateness of its content and structure and assist them implement or rebuild their IR websites. The overriding imperative is to ensure the IR website meets the information needs of […]

Read More
9 May 2017

When to Publish the Annual Report – A New Benchmark is Emerging

VICTORIA GEDDES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Ten years ago I can remember marvelling at those companies that managed to get it together and release their full, glossy annual report on the same day as reporting their full year results. You could count them on the fingers of one hand. More commonly, three to four months after the […]

Read More

Archives